Finland Likely a Step Closer to Removing Veikkaus Gaming Monopoly

A study into Finland s gaming industry has been in the works for months in an effort to determine if its monopoly, , is working. Even the state-run organization believes it s not 100% effective, and the chances are increasing that it will lose some of its control.

The task of the working group, established by the Ministry of the Interior, has been to find out what should be done about Finland s gambling monopoly. The initial results show issues that confirm why monopolies don t work, with the Finnish government losing considerable revenue.

Veikkaus wants change as quickly as possible, according to a statement it released. Its monopoly could shrink to slot machines and products, but it might compete with foreign operators in the iGaming segment.

The government-led study determined that at least €500 million ($547 million) a year already flows from Finland to foreign gambling companies. At the same time, more than 50K Finns suffer from gambling addiction, a problem that s exacerbated by a lack of oversight.

As a result, there are two solutions on the table. Finland could switch to a licensing system that would open the market to regulated foreign operators for a fee. The other option is to strengthen the control Veikkaus has over the market and clamp down on unlicensed online gaming activity.

Across Europe, with the exception of Finland and Norway, the first option has become the norm. Meanwhile, numerous studies in those two countries have already proven that gaming monopolies are .

In the countries with licensing systems, which the working group has compared, 80%-90% of gambling has been channeled to licensed companies. The so-called degree of channelization is significantly higher than in Finland today.

Almost everyone in the Riksdag, Finland s legislature, is in favor of abolishing Veikkaus monopoly, according to previous research. Veikkaus itself has that the monopoly isn t working.

Economist Harri Sailas, who heads the working group studying the issue, is still on the fence.

In the working group s deliberations, Veikkaus monopoly would still remain. It would retain the exclusivity of slot machines in supermarkets, physical casinos, retail betting, and the lottery.

Veikkaus would, however, give up ground online. Veikkaus could acquire an online gaming license like other operators, but would no longer enjoy its monopolistic control.

Should the online casino and sports betting markets be opened, Sailas is in favor of a tax rate of between 20%-25%. This, he explains, would cover the costs of establishing and maintaining a regulator, while delivering significant revenue to the government. It would also give Finland funds to try to block unlicensed platforms.

The debate continues and there s no hint on which way the government will go. Based on the evidence and the beliefs of those in the Riksdag, it s increasingly possible that Veikkaus will have to concede defeat in some gaming segments.